<\/p>\n
At the end of June \u2013 in the run-up to America\u2019s celebration of the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence \u2013 President Donald Trump staged the White House\u2019s first-ever professional sporting event. And while the UFC Freedom 250 evening of mixed martial arts was ostensibly part of the July 4 jamboree, Trump took the opportunity to promote his family\u2019s business interests.<\/p>\n
Fighters were paid bonuses in $1 stablecoins, the cryptocurrency owned by the Trump family, while the event itself cost a reported $60 million, much of which was taxpayers\u2019 money.<\/p>\n
The US president\u2019s ability to make money while in office has been a focus of attention since his financial reports for 2025 were made public at the end of June. His reported revenue jumped from $622 million in 2024 to $2.2 billion in 2025, the first year of his second term.<\/p>\n
While he and his family claim that there is no conflict of interest, there is little doubt that Trump has been able to profit from his position. But how does his financial gain as president stack up with some of his recent predecessors?<\/p>\n
The Kennedy family were famously wealthy. The family\u2019s patriarch, Joseph Kennedy, put some of his money into trusts for his children, allowing John Fitzgerald, Robert Francis and generations of future Kennedys to pursue politics without financial worry or conflicts between business and public service.<\/p>\n
Kennedy\u2019s successor Lyndon B Johnson owned significant land and a small media empire in Austin, Texas with his wife Lady Bird, all of which was put into a blind trust and officially controlled without the Johnsons\u2019 involvement while he was in office.<\/p>\n
ADVERTISEMENT<\/p>\n
CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n
During the 1972 election cycle, Time magazine reported that incumbent president, Richard Nixon had improved his finances by just over $300 000 during his first presidential term, noting that he was \u201cnot yet a millionaire\u201d. Most of Nixon\u2019s financial assets were tied up in property and his civil service pension.<\/p>\n
Jimmy Carter\u2019s famous peanut farm assets were put into a trust when he won office, and he left the presidency in $1m of debt following droughts in Georgia. Ronald Reagan, who succeeded Carter and was not a businessmen but a film actor-turned-politician, came to office with some assets. His assets \u2013 valued in 1981 at about $4 million, mainly made up of his two properties \u2013 were also held in trust while he was in office.<\/p>\n
George W Bush made almost $15 million selling his stake in the Dallas-based Texas Rangers baseball franchise in 1998, while he served as governor of Texas. Barack Obama earned money from royalties on book sales while in office, but both he and Bill Clinton have amassed considerable wealth since leaving office.<\/p>\n
None of these presidents appeared to leverage their presidency or their image to earn money while in office in the way that Trump has during his second term. Instead, they tended towards waiting until the post-presidency years.<\/p>\n
Lucrative memoirs<\/p>\n
Making money post-presidency is hardly a new story\u2013 the likes of James Buchanan and Ulysses S Grant penned memoirs to earn money as far back as the 19th century. Nixon penned a well-paid memoir and made a lucrative and famous series of television interviews with David Frost in 1977 that earned him a base payment of $600 000 \u2013 over $3 million in 2026.<\/p>\n
ADVERTISEMENT:<\/p>\n
CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n
Perhaps the most lucrative of these post-presidential careers has belonged to Bill Clinton. Still a relatively young man of 54 when he left office, he moved into a public speaking and advising career. By 2016, he had made $189 million, $38 million of which had come from memoirs and other writing projects.<\/p>\n
Barack Obama followed suit, pre-selling the rights to his memoirs immediately after leaving office for in a combined book deal with his wife Michelle reported to be $60 million.<\/p>\n
Obama waited until he had officially stepped down before publicly concluding negotiations with Penguin Random House, taking the same pains as his predecessors to avoid the accusation of conflicting interests between his public service and private business.<\/p>\n
Cashing in on the presidency?<\/p>\n
No modern president has come close to Trump\u2019s earnings, either while in office or after leaving.<\/p>\n
In his first term, Trump made attempts to differentiate his businessman persona from his new profession. Sean Spicer, his first White House press secretary, announced in 2017 that Trump was donating his first quarter earnings to the National Park service, a tradition he continued throughout his presidency. But he still amassed business revenues of $2.4 billion \u2013 more than his predecessors by a considerable margin.<\/p>\n
But even this could well be dwarfed by the amount of money Trump stands to make in his second term, if the first year is any guide. The 47th US president continues to argue that he follows the same path as other presidents and that his wealth is managed at arms\u2019s length by external trusts and partnerships.<\/p>\n
ADVERTISEMENT:<\/p>\n
CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n
But the recent launch of Truth API \u2013 a paid-for data feed which gives access in \u201cmilliseconds\u201d to posts on TruthSocial, a social media platform launched by Trump in February 2022 \u2013 has led to calls from his political opponents for the Securities and Exchange Commission to investigate. Posts by the president and other powerful people on the platform are known to move markets.<\/p>\n
A recent poll by CNN has found that nearly two-thirds of Americans believe that Trump has gone too far in pursuing his personal business interests while serving as president. Whether this will hurt his party\u2019s prospects in the midterm elections in November is yet to be seen. But what is clear is that the immense amount of money the US president has earned \u2013 and the power he wields over regulatory systems \u2013 now blurs the lines between public office and private business in a way that few other American leaders have.<\/p>\n
Benjamin Quail, Lecturer in US Cultural and Social History, Queen\u2019s University Belfast<\/p>\n
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.<\/p>\n
#Donald #Trump #2.2bn #term<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
At the end of June \u2013 in the run-up to America\u2019s celebration of the 250th…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[19027,7074,8227,721],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13239"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13239"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13239\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13239"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13239"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13239"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}