{"id":14638,"date":"2026-08-27T08:19:55","date_gmt":"2026-08-27T08:19:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/?p=14638"},"modified":"2026-08-27T08:19:55","modified_gmt":"2026-08-27T08:19:55","slug":"us-to-spend-billions-to-power-army-bases-with-nuclear-reactors","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/?p=14638","title":{"rendered":"US to spend billions to power army bases with nuclear reactors"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<p>The US Army is planning to deploy small reactors to power five bases across the country, investing $2.2 billion to accelerate the Trump Administration\u2019s efforts to boost America\u2019s nuclear industry.<\/p>\n<p>Under the Janus Program, the Army has tapped five suppliers that will each be working at a single site, according to a statement Wednesday. The effort is expected to lead to a total of more than 20 reactors being installed within five years, with at least one going into service by the end of September 2028.<\/p>\n<p>The initiative is part of the Trump administration\u2019s broader push to revive a US nuclear industry that has regained momentum but added little capacity in decades. The White House aims to quadruple US reactor capacity by 2050, while the Air Force in April announced plans to power three sites with reactors. But the military projects will rely on untested designs and some suppliers that have little or no track record of building power plants, creating a risk that some of these projects could fall behind schedule or miss key milestones.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere are no companies that have complete microreactor designs,\u201d Jeff Waksman, principal deputy assistant secretary of the Army for installations, energy and environment, said during a conference call. \u201cWe know that this is going to be very difficult and that there\u2019s a very real chance that one or more of these companies will fail.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>ADVERTISEMENT<\/p>\n<p>CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<p>These are the nuclear suppliers that will be responsible for building, owning and operating power plants at the sites:<\/p>\n<p>Antares Nuclear \u2014 Fort Bragg, North Carolina<br \/>\nRadiant Industries \u2014 Fort Benning, Georgia<br \/>\nWestinghouse Electric \u2014 Fort Drum, New York<br \/>\nBWX Technologies\u00a0 \u2014 Fort Campbell, Kentucky<br \/>\nGeneral Atomics \u2014 Fort Hood, Texas<\/p>\n<p>The companies are pursuing a broad range of technologies and sizes, though all are developing so-called microreactors: power plants that typically have less than 20 megawatts of capacity. That\u2019s much smaller than the conventional nuclear plants that are widely used today and usually have about 1 gigawatt of capacity. The smaller size is better suited for a base or campus, and are designed to supply reliable electricity even if the facility is isolated or cut off from the local power grid.<\/p>\n<p>Westinghouse is known for its large nuclear plants, but the Janus Program involves a new design that has never been built. BWXT has a long history of supplying reactors for US Navy vessels and has been involved in an earlier military project, but this effort involves a larger design. General Atomics is a defence contractor with a strong background in nuclear energy, but it\u2019s also developing a new reactor for the Army program. Antares and Radiant are both startups that have yet to deliver completed systems to a customer.<\/p>\n<p>The efforts to install nuclear reactors at Department of Defence sites is designed to make US military bases more resilient as adversaries target the power grid, according to Lucian Niemeyer, a former assistant secretary for defence who served during Trump\u2019s first administration.<\/p>\n<p>ADVERTISEMENT:<\/p>\n<p>CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe realize the grid is prime target,\u201d said Niemeyer, who is now a principal at The United Coalition for Advanced Nuclear. \u201cThere are cyber threats facing our grid, there are drone threats. What the DOD is trying to do is get those targets off the grid.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The program is also aimed at advancing the US nuclear industry, Waksman said. Having reactors in service at military bases will help the suppliers move forward with developing and licensing civilian projects.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere\u2019s always that big first-of-a-kind risk with any new reactor technology,\u201d he said. \u201cWe believe that this will be the spear tip, not just for microreactors, but for all advanced reactors in the United States.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u00a9 2026 Bloomberg<\/p>\n<p>                        #spend #billions #power #army #bases #nuclear #reactors<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The US Army is planning to deploy small reactors to power five bases across the&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[5270,20224,5135,4736,668,20240,1526],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14638"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14638"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14638\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14638"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14638"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14638"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}