{"id":19342,"date":"2026-10-29T20:17:00","date_gmt":"2026-10-29T20:17:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/?p=19342"},"modified":"2026-10-29T20:17:00","modified_gmt":"2026-10-29T20:17:00","slug":"fitch-vs-treasury-is-sas-debt-outlook-improving","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/?p=19342","title":{"rendered":"Fitch vs Treasury: Is SA\u2019s debt outlook improving?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<p>You can also listen to this podcast on iono.fm here.<\/p>\n<p>JIMMY MOYAHA: The South African story is quite an interesting one. We\u2019re going to look at two aspects of our economy.<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019re going to take a look at the reflections from last week\u2019s mid-term budget policy statement, where National Treasury projected that it sees debt coming down.<\/p>\n<p>The ratings agency known as Fitch has since come out to potentially disagree with some of the aspects and some of the findings of National Treasury.<\/p>\n<p>Read: Fitch diverges from National Treasury on debt outlook<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019re going to explore that, but we\u2019re also going to see if we can take a look at today\u2019s announcement by Stats\u00a0SA on the rebasing of South Africa\u2019s economy.<\/p>\n<p>Read: SA economy 5.3% bigger than thought after GDP rebasing<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m joined on the line by director and chief economist at the Efficient Group, Dawie Roodt, to take a look at this and see what we make of these developments.<\/p>\n<p>Oom Dawie, lovely having you on the show, as always. Thanks so much for taking the time. Let\u2019s start with that Fitch expectation \u2013 or the Fitch commentary \u2013 around South Africa\u2019s picture differing from what Moody\u2019s has put out, and their expressed opinions. Give us a sense of where Fitch\u2019s divergence comes from.<\/p>\n<p>DAWIE ROODT: Yes, hello, good evening to you. This is Oom Dawie, as you say.<\/p>\n<p>Jimmy, a better place perhaps to start is to actually start with the rebasing of the South African economy, because we\u2019re talking about the debt-to-GDP ratio and the GDP numbers that have been revised.<\/p>\n<p>ADVERTISEMENT<\/p>\n<p>CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<p>The minister of finance, based on the previous GDP numbers, reckoned that the South African economy\u2019s debt to GDP will probably stabilise.<\/p>\n<p>Some of the rating agencies disagree with that. They think that the debt-to-GDP ratio will continue to go [up] \u2013 and I actually agree with them.<\/p>\n<p>And the main reason why I agree with them is because I do not believe the economy is going to grow at 1.6% next year and 2% the year thereafter, based on what the minister of finance said in his medium-term budget policy statement last week.<\/p>\n<p>But, having said that, Stats South Africa \u2013 as you mentioned \u2013 revised South Africa\u2019s GDP numbers, and the South African economy is actually bigger than we thought previously.<\/p>\n<p>Now, that is not going to affect the debt numbers as such, but it\u2019s certainly going to affect the ratio of debt as a percentage of GDP, which is certainly going to be lower than we thought previously.<\/p>\n<p>Previously we thought the debt is probably going to stabilise at about 78%, 79%.<\/p>\n<p>And now that the economy is actually bigger than we thought previously, we\u2019re talking about the whole thing coming down to probably about 74% or maybe 75% or so. So there are many moving parts here.<\/p>\n<p>The real question here is: Is the South African economy going to grow or not? That is actually the underlying question.<\/p>\n<p>The answer to that is: I\u2019m afraid I\u2019m not that optimistic. I think this year economic growth is probably going to be in the region of 1.7% to 1.8%, and next year I don\u2019t see 1.6% \u2013 as the\u00a0minister of finance\u00a0thought. And the year thereafter also not a 2%, unless we make some significant changes to macroeconomic policy.<\/p>\n<p>We are kind of stuck in a growth trajectory of about 1%, or perhaps just over 1%.<\/p>\n<p>JIMMY MOYAHA: Oom Dawie, can we take a look at this rebasing in more detail? It\u2019s something that doesn\u2019t happen very often, and I can imagine that when it does happen it does tend to have a positive effect \u2013 as it has in this case.<\/p>\n<p>But we can\u2019t be reliant on something that isn\u2019t a regular occurrence, can we?<\/p>\n<p>DAWIE ROODT: No, no. Well, nothing has really changed.<\/p>\n<p>Let me just make a comment about economic statistics, economic data. Just about all economic data are estimates.<\/p>\n<p>There are some hard numbers, like for example the exchange rate; you can actually see what it is, you can see what the bonds are trading at, you know what the what interest rates are. So those sorts of numbers are actually hard numbers.<\/p>\n<p>But for the rest of those economic data, most of them are estimates, and economists don\u2019t even agree among themselves about what should be included in a basket of CPI, of inflation, for example \u2013 and economists certainly do not agree what should be included in GDP numbers.<\/p>\n<p>ADVERTISEMENT:<\/p>\n<p>CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s a lot of debate about what should be included, but there\u2019s a kind of standard, and there are certain ways of getting all these data.<\/p>\n<p>Every five years or so, Stats South Africa \u2013 and they\u2019re supposed to do it every five years \u2013 is supposed to revise all of this and see if the economy still looks the same as previously.<\/p>\n<p>The economy never looks the same, because the nature of economic activities keeps on changing.<\/p>\n<p>A very good example is that in the year 2000 cellphone usage was much, much lower than today, and we included cellphone usage \u2013 and it\u2019s playing a bigger role in the South African economy today than in the year 2000. That\u2019s one example. There are many other examples.<\/p>\n<p>So they revise it every now and again, and they also improve on their data collection.<\/p>\n<p>And after they\u2019ve done that, we realise that the South African economy is actually a little better or a little bigger. It\u2019s not bigger \u2013 it\u2019s just the way that we measure this.<\/p>\n<p>Better information and some change in some definitions \u2013 that gives us a better indication or better idea of the size of the economy.<\/p>\n<p>But the big plus, of course, is that certain ratios \u2013 like the deficit and the debt numbers \u2013 will come in lower now because we realise that the economy is bigger.<\/p>\n<p>But when we look at economic growth, economic growth is still probably going to be in the region of what I\u2019ve said \u2013 about 1% or so over the next few years. I hope that makes sense.<\/p>\n<p>JIMMY MOYAHA: Oom Dawie, that rebasing and the increased measurement, I suppose, of the South African economy \u2013 I want to take a look at what that could mean for rating decisions going forward.<\/p>\n<p>We know that Fitch is set to give us a rating decision on the 11th of December. We know that S&amp;P and Moody\u2019s will deliver their decisions in November. So before the end of the year we will have all three rating agencies comment on South Africa.<\/p>\n<p>What do you think this is going to fuel in terms of how they see the economy in South Africa?<\/p>\n<p>DAWIE ROODT: Well, the South African economy, as it turns out, is about 5% bigger than we thought previously. Some countries rebase or recalculate the size of their economies; I can remember some time ago Nigeria did that and they realised that the economy is about 25% bigger than they thought previously.<\/p>\n<p>So 5% is not really going to make much of a difference. But it\u2019s not that level, Jimmy, that really matters here. It\u2019s more the direction, the trend, that really matters.<\/p>\n<p>And the trend has been an upward trend in recent years, and I think the trend is likely to stabilise. The\u00a0minister of finance\u00a0also indicated that the trend is likely to stabilise at about 89%.<\/p>\n<p>ADVERTISEMENT:<\/p>\n<p>CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<p>Fitch reckons it\u2019s going to keep on going up a little, and I also reckon it\u2019s probably going to go up a little. So the same trajectory probably can be expected. Currently, debt to GDP is at about 74% \u2013 I\u2019m getting confused with all these numbers, 74% or so \u2013 and it\u2019s probably going to go up a little over the next couple of years as well.<\/p>\n<p>I do not think that is going to affect Fitch\u2019s decision that much, but some numbers certainly do look better, and the most important one here is the deficit as a percentage of GDP, which is likely to come down, and come down quite nicely.<\/p>\n<p>JIMMY MOYAHA: Oom Dawie, before I let you go, what does that then mean for the attractiveness of South Africa from an investment perspective? The rebasing is one part of it; the growth is the critical part that you mentioned. If we\u2019re not able to evidence growth, we\u2019re not going to attract investment into the South African economy.<\/p>\n<p>When we look at that investment story, how do we position South Africa\u2019s economy to be able to attract that investment and the growth?<\/p>\n<p>DAWIE ROODT: Well, all in all, what we realise now is we have a slightly bigger economy to play around with.<\/p>\n<p>But [as for] certain kinds of assets, I would look, for example, at the capital market and the financial market, generally speaking. I think those will remain attractive, but that is mostly to do with the way that monetary policy is maintained in South Africa.<\/p>\n<p>For the rest of the economy, will you start a factory? Will you start a new mine in South Africa?<\/p>\n<p>I think the normal obstacles that we have are still there, and we have to do something about those kinds of obstacles.<\/p>\n<p>So certainly a slightly better position than that in which we are, but this is not going to change that much to the outlook for the average South African.<\/p>\n<p>What we can say now is that the economic statistics are a little better than previously.<\/p>\n<p>JIMMY MOYAHA: The numbers look a little better, but economic growth is still the fundamental building block that we need to be focusing on. It is the critical aspect that is the differentiator between whether or not we see an improved South African economy or a stagnant one.<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019ll have to leave the conversation on that note. Dawie Roodt, director and chief economist at Efficient Group, joined us to share his thoughts on Fitch\u2019s disagreements with National Treasury, but also on South Africa\u2019s rebasing of its economy.<\/p>\n<p>                        #Fitch #Treasury #SAs #debt #outlook #improving<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>You can also listen to this podcast on iono.fm here. JIMMY MOYAHA: The South African&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[1555,10818,17534,4312,415,4192],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19342"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=19342"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19342\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=19342"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=19342"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=19342"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}