![](\"https:\/\/fortune.com\/img-assets\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/GettyImages-2268868959-e1775415227723.jpg?w=2048\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Of all the things Donald Trump has done to disrupt global commerce, from levying punitive tariffs to tearing up trade deals, few would be as consequential as withdrawing and leaving the rest of the world to secure the Persian Gulf.<\/p>\n
The move, which the US president has repeatedly\u00a0threatened\u00a0as his war with Iran drags on, would represent a break with decades of US policy keeping open the sea lanes that carry\u00a0four-fifths\u00a0of the $35 trillion global goods trade. Even the threat of reducing security for the Strait of Hormuz risks shaking confidence in a pillar of the world economy, as well as American wealth and power.<\/p>\n
Traffic through the strait has dropped to a handful of ships daily from about 135 before the war, with Iran allowing passage mainly for its own exports. Those conditions are putting at risk roughly one-fifth of global oil flows, driving up prices and injecting volatility into energy markets.<\/p>\n
Since World War II, the US has used its navy to deter attacks, counter piracy and challenge attempts by states to restrict lawful passage across the oceans that cover\u00a0more than 70%\u00a0of the Earth\u2019s surface. Those guarantees have allowed oil, goods and commodities to pass across borders with minimal friction.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe free flow of commerce through the strait is a larger principle at stake in this conflict,\u201d said retired Vice Admiral\u00a0John W. Miller, former commander of US Fifth Fleet in Bahrain. \u201cFailure to ensure freedom of navigation in Hormuz puts global freedom of navigation everywhere at risk.\u201d<\/p>\n
European and Asian officials, who spoke to Bloomberg on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said the conflict has eroded faith in the US role as protector of the high seas, raising concerns about energy prices, shifting security calculations around key choke points and growing doubts about Washington\u2019s ability to manage the consequences of the war.<\/p>\n
And it\u2019s more than just Hormuz. The Trump administration\u2019s campaign to blow up speed boats suspected of ferrying drugs across the Caribbean and doubts about whether the Navy made sufficient efforts to save crew members of an Iranian warship it sank off the coast of Sri Lanka have raised questions about the US\u2019s commitment to the rules that protect all sailors at sea.<\/p>\n
A Pentagon spokesperson didn\u2019t answer a question about whether the US was still committed to ensuring freedom of navigation, saying only that the military \u201ccontinues to provide the president options\u201d regarding the strait. The White House didn\u2019t respond to a request for comment.<\/p>\n
In the absence of a US plan, smaller, trade-dependent nations have sought to build consensus for a multinational response. The United Arab Emirates on Tuesday\u00a0urged\u00a0the United Nations to authorize a range of measures, including force, to reopen the strait. The UK on Thursday\u00a0convened representatives from more than 40 American allies to discuss nonmilitary options to convince Tehran to restore trade.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen the Strait of Hormuz is strangled, the world\u2019s poorest and most vulnerable cannot breathe,\u201d UN Secretary-General Ant\u00f3nio Guterres said on Thursday. \u201cFreedom of navigation must be upheld.\u201d<\/p>\n
The free passage of vessels through choke points like Hormuz and the Strait of Malacca is protected under principles laid out in the\u00a0UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. While the US never ratified the treaty, it played a key role in the document\u2019s drafting and its almost 300-ship navy has served as chief enforcer of the rules.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Those include prohibition against regulating vessels that move between open waters, even if the route cuts through their territorial seas. Iran\u2019s attempts to deny passage or charge fees in the Hormuz strait \u2014 as much as $2 million per transit \u2014 challenge that system.\u00a0<\/p>\n
In response, Trump has alternately suggested asserting US control over the waterway and leaving other nations to take responsibility for it.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u201cThe countries of the world that do receive oil through the Hormuz Strait must take care of that passage,\u201d Trump said Wednesday in a televised address on the conflict. \u201cThey must cherish it. They must grab it and cherish it. They can do it easily.\u201d<\/p>\n
Even if the fighting stops, the disruption may persist. Shipping and oil-market analysts say a ceasefire without a plan to reopen the strait risks leaving the strategic artery in Tehran\u2019s hands, prolonging the shock.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis will not be a crisis that ends with a ceasefire announcement,\u201d said Angelica Kemene, head of market strategy at Optima Shipping Services in Athens. \u201cIt\u2019s a structural shift in how the Gulf operates as an energy export corridor.\u201d<\/p>\n
Read More:\u00a0What It Would Take to Reopen the Strait of Hormuz: Explainer<\/p>\n
The threat of Iranian attacks has kept most ship operators out of the strait since the US and Israel began strikes on Feb. 28 and that caution is unlikely to fade quickly, leaving any initial reopening dependent on naval escorts.<\/p>\n
Vessels moving through Hormuz\u00a0have largely been\u00a0Iran-linked ships or those belonging to countries friendly with Tehran. That allows the Islamic Republic to earn almost $139 million per day in oil revenues \u2014 more than before the war, thanks to higher prices.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt is a violation of maritime law to impede the free flow of travel in international waters,\u201d US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Tuesday. \u201cIt\u2019s illegal to hit commercial shipping and sink them. That\u2019s what the Nazis did in World War II in the Atlantic.\u201d<\/p>\n
Iran, which also hasn\u2019t ratified the sea-law treaty, is moving to formalize its control. A parliamentary committee has\u00a0approved\u00a0legislation to impose fees in the strait, according to the semi-official Fars news agency, though the bill has yet to go to a full vote. Authorities have already charged some vessels and barred ships from the US and countries supporting its military campaign, including Israel.<\/p>\n
Tanker War<\/p>\n
Asked about the US\u2019s commitment to freedom of the seas, a White House official said Iran won\u2019t be allowed to set up a permanent system that controls access to the Hormuz strait. The US has already destroyed 44 Iranian mine-laying vessels during the war and Trump is confident the strait will be opened very soon, the official said.<\/p>\n
Ensuring the strait remains open has long been a core US objective in any conflict in the region. The US has intervened before to keep Hormuz open, notably during the so-called tanker war between Iran and Iraq in the 1980s.<\/p>\n
The Navy has for years played a central role in maritime campaigns to suppress piracy off the Somali coast. More recently, the US led efforts to protect Red Sea shipping after attacks by the Iran-linked Houthis in Yemen caused vessels to make long, costly journeys around Africa.<\/p>\n
The economic toll of Iran\u2019s control over Hormuz is already clear: Iran\u2019s grip on Hormuz comes at the expense of other major Gulf producers, with the potential to reshape global energy supplies.<\/p>\n
Iraq\u2019s exports plunged by about 80% in March compared with last year\u2019s average daily volumes, while Saudi Arabia has rerouted crude through its east-west pipeline to the Red Sea, now running near capacity at roughly 7 million barrels a day. Even so, the kingdom was facing a drop of more than 25% in exports last month.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe war in the Middle East is creating the largest supply disruption in the history of the global oil market,\u201d the International Energy Agency said in early March.<\/p>\n
Insurance costs have surged alongside the risk. Additional war-risk premiums that were about 0.15% of a ship\u2019s value before the war have jumped as high as 10% in some cases in and around the strait, deterring operators from returning even if hostilities ease.<\/p>\n
The disruption if allowed to persist could carry geopolitical consequences \u2014 especially in Asia. Washington\u2019s commitment to that policy has been visibly demonstrated by the so-called freedom of navigation operations, or Fonops, that the US Navy conducts by asserting its right to sail through contested waterways.\u00a0<\/p>\n
If the US ends its campaign without reopening the strait, it risks setting a precedent that it won\u2019t challenge expansive Chinese claims to the South and East China seas. Southeast Asian officials said such an outcome would deal a significant blow to US credibility in keeping sea lanes open.<\/p>\n
It would also increase the incentive for Chinese President Xi Jinping, who now commands the world\u2019s largest navy by number of ships, to assert greater influence at sea.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf the US doesn\u2019t have the ability to enforce freedom of navigation in the Straint of Hormuz, what then stops the People\u2019s Liberation Army Navy from pushing things a bit farther in the South China Sea?\u201d said\u00a0Emma Salisbury, non-resident senior fellow in the National Security Program at the Foreign Policy Research Institute. \u201cThat\u2019s a worrying precedent.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n
That shift is already shaping how governments think about their security.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Officials said it could push countries to strengthen their capabilities around chokepoints, such as the Strait of Malacca, and coordinate more closely to uphold maritime norms under international law. The conflict has also shown that countries with sufficient military power and political will can move to control critical waterways.<\/p>\n
While Europe is less directly dependent on Hormuz, its economy relies on the smooth functioning of global shipping routes. European officials said the episode is forcing a rethink of how allies protect sea lanes.\u00a0<\/p>\n
If the US were seen as unwilling or unable to keep key waterways open, countries may have to assume greater risk and adjust how they deploy forces, one official said. Major European economies also are assessing how to cushion any impact to other vulnerable shipping routes such as the Red Sea and the South China Sea.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u201cIran controlling the Strait of Hormuz after the war would be a game-changer,\u201d said Lucio Blanco Pitlo III, a Philippine foreign policy analyst. \u201cUS credibility as guarantor of unhampered navigation of crucial waterways will suffer.\u201d<\/p>\n
#Trump #risks #confidence #U.S #role #guardian #global #shipping<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Of all the things Donald Trump has done to disrupt global commerce, from levying punitive…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[245],"tags":[1616,423,7232,376,1028,1283,1181,721,722],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3181"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3181"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3181\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3181"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3181"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3181"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}