{"id":4700,"date":"2026-04-24T06:21:21","date_gmt":"2026-04-24T06:21:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/?p=4700"},"modified":"2026-04-24T06:21:21","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T06:21:21","slug":"apples-tim-cook-is-under-pressure-but-there-are-a-few-key-reasons-leadership-experts-think-hes-still-the-guy-for-the-job","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/?p=4700","title":{"rendered":"Apple&#8217;s Tim Cook is under pressure\u2014but there are a few key reasons leadership experts think he&#8217;s still the guy for the job"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img src=\"https:\/\/fortune.com\/img-assets\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/GettyImages-2224174932.jpg?w=2048\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Is it time for Apple CEO Tim Cook to clean out his office? You might think so after the past few weeks. But top experts on CEO successions counsel settling down and looking at the big picture. It shows why Cook might remain CEO for years and why that might even be the best course for Apple.<\/p>\n<p>The recent depressing news included a top Apple AI executive\u2019s defection to Meta just weeks after another high-level AI researcher had left\u2014especially painful because Apple is widely seen as a laggard in the world\u2019s hottest technology, AI. Last month Apple\u2019s annual Worldwide Developer Conference, often a scene of breathtaking new products or services, was \u201ca snoozer,\u201d said Wedbush analyst Dan Ives. While stocks of Microsoft and Alphabet are hitting new highs, Apple is down 16% this year.<\/p>\n<p>Little wonder that a Wall Street research firm, Lightshed, concluded Cook is no longer the right boss for Apple. The company \u201cnow needs a product-focused CEO, not one centered on logistics,\u201d the firm wrote. \u201cAI is not something that Apple can merely \u2018pull the string\u2019 on. Missing on AI could fundamentally alter the company\u2019s long-term trajectory and ability to grow at all.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>By earlier standards, Cook would have been on his way out in any case. In August he will have been CEO for 14 years, and in November he turns 65. But 65 is nothing special anymore, and no board of directors will hurry to dispatch a CEO who created far more shareholder value than his legendary predecessor, Steve Jobs, ever did. At least in theory, the options for Cook and the board are wide open.<\/p>\n<p>So what should Cook and the board do? To get an authoritative answer, Fortune recruited three eminent executive search experts, each of whom has counseled scores of major boards on managing successions. We agreed to withhold their names so that they could speak completely candidly. Here are their combined thoughts\u2014as well as the final word from preeminent business historian Richard Tedlow, who gives a compelling comeback to anyone who thinks Cook\u2019s time is up.<\/p>\n<p>Apple\u2019s competitive environment now. \u201cTwo things are happening in parallel. One is AI, which is a much bigger deal than the internet was. The second thing is the evolution of the hardware. There\u2019s a \u2018good enough\u2019 problem. For most users, the phones are good enough. I\u2019m a power phone user, and I use a several-year-old iPhone because there\u2019s no compelling reason to upgrade. Those two things in combination make for a more challenging environment for Apple.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>At the same time, the consultants see a temporary upside for Apple. \u201cThey don\u2019t have the existential threat that Google has from AI. Apple still has the platform\u2014I\u2019m still using my Apple phone to reference ChatGPT. They\u2019re not losing revenue in that exchange. So if you look at where they make money, they actually don\u2019t need a quick entry [into AI].\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cRemember, Apple has never been first to market with anything. They\u2019re considered to be the most innovative company in the world, but they have largely taken a concept that\u2019s been proven and made it applicable for use in ways that are highly innovative and esthetically appealing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Still, the clock has been ticking for a while. \u201cI would be shocked if within the next 12 months they do not release a truly functioning baseline agent to replace Siri.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>When might Cook be thinking of stepping down? \u201cThat\u2019s really the foundational question. If it\u2019s two years, are there any outsiders who could plausibly come in? Are there any boomerang people who could come back from outside of Apple?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cApple is less likely to go outside because of the cultural history of outsiders at Apple. It\u2019s almost revered, the story of how outsiders almost killed Apple [before Steve Jobs returned in 1997]. We hear pretty consistently that Cook is thinking of an age 68 to 70 timeline [which would be three to five years from now.] He feels that, with AI, there\u2019s some unfinished business.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI don\u2019t think Tim will be CEO until he\u2019s 70. I think he\u2019s tired, honestly. It\u2019s been an exhausting journey, and he\u2019s amazing, but I do sense a different energy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>What kind of executive will Cook\u2019s successor be? \u201cThe common wisdom is that they really need a product visionary, as opposed to the operational genius that he was. I would argue that until the tariff and supply chain issues get resolved, they probably do need him at the helm because that is a non-trivial issue for them.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Who are the leading candidates to succeed Cook? \u201cThe most obvious are John [Ternus] and Craig [Federighi].\u201d Ternus is senior vice president hardware engineering. Federighi is senior vice president software engineering. \u201cBut given the timeline, [the company] could still make quite a few changes, and it could be somebody quite different.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere are a few companies where being a CEO is really like being the president of a country, and Apple is one of those. There are maybe a dozen. It sounds kind of heretical to say, but to some degree, the smaller part of the job is effectively operating the company.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Bottom line, what is the big-picture assessment of Tim Cook? For this we turn to a business historian, Richard Tedlow, an emeritus professor at the Harvard Business School. Like any good professor, he asks questions. He starts by asking five crucial questions about Apple: Does it satisfy customers? Does it come from behind? Does it have a powerful corporate culture? Is it willing to admit mistakes? Does it have \u201can imagination of disaster,\u201d a realization that things could go badly wrong? Approvingly, he answers Yes to all. Told that a Wall Street research firm has said Cook should resign, Tedlow notes that Warren Buffett invited Cook to Berkshire Hathaway\u2019s annual meeting in May and said, \u201cI\u2019m somewhat embarrassed to say that Tim Cook has made Berkshire a lot more money than I\u2019ve ever made [for] Berkshire Hathaway.\u201d Tedlow asks, \u201cIf that Wall Street firm called Buffett and said, \u2018Warren, do you think it\u2019s time to get rid of Tim Cook,\u2019 what do you think Warren would say?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Tedlow\u2019s ultimate query: \u201cIf you could choose anybody to be the CEO of Apple right now\u2014anybody in the whole history of business, from John Jacob Astor to John D. Rockefeller to Tom Watson Sr. to Andy Grove to Tim Cook\u2014whom would you choose?\u00a0This is actually not a difficult question.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>#Apples #Tim #Cook #pressurebut #key #reasons #leadership #experts #hes #guy #job<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Is it time for Apple CEO Tim Cook to clean out his office? You might&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[245],"tags":[1819,7635,24,6056,9839,1976,315,9313,634,1680,9838,192,4026,8593],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4700"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4700"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4700\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4700"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4700"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4700"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}