![](\"https:\/\/fortune.com\/img-assets\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/GettyImages-2272094426-e1777066963919.jpg?w=2048\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
An appeals court on Friday\u00a0blocked\u00a0President Donald Trump\u2019s executive order suspending asylum access at the southern border of the U.S., a key pillar of the Republican president\u2019s plan to crack down on migration.<\/p>\n
A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit found that immigration laws give people the right to apply for\u00a0asylum at the border, and the president can\u2019t circumvent that.<\/p>\n
The court opinion stems from action taken by Trump on Inauguration Day 2025, when he declared that the situation at the southern border constituted an invasion of America and that he was \u201csuspending the physical entry\u201d of migrants and their ability to seek asylum until he decides it is over.<\/p>\n
The panel concluded that the\u00a0Immigration and Nationality Act doesn\u2019t authorize the president\u00a0to remove the plaintiffs under \u201cprocedures of his own making,\u201d allow him to suspend plaintiffs\u2019 right to apply for asylum or curtail procedures for adjudicating their anti-torture claims.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe power by proclamation to temporarily suspend the entry of specified foreign individuals into the United States does not contain implicit authority to override the INA\u2019s mandatory process to summarily remove foreign individuals,\u201d wrote Judge J. Michelle Childs, who was nominated to the bench by Democratic President Joe Biden.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe conclude that the INA\u2019s text, structure, and history make clear that in supplying power to suspend entry by Presidential proclamation, Congress did not intend to grant the Executive the expansive removal authority it asserts,\u201d the opinion said.<\/p>\n
White House says asylum ban was within Trump\u2019s powers<\/p>\n
The administration can ask the full appeals court to reconsider the ruling or go to the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n
The order doesn\u2019t formally take effect until after the court considers any request to reconsider.<\/p>\n
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, speaking on Fox News, said she had not seen the ruling but called it \u201cunsurprising,\u201d blaming politically-motivated judges.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey are not acting as true litigators of the law. They are looking at these cases from a political lens,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n
Leavitt said Trump was taking actions that are \u201ccompletely within his powers as commander in chief.\u201d<\/p>\n
White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said the Department of Justice would seek further review of the decision. \u201cWe are sure we will be vindicated,\u201d she wrote in an emailed statement.<\/p>\n
The Department of Homeland Security said it strongly disagreed with the ruling.<\/p>\n
\u201cPresident Trump\u2019s top priority remains the screening and vetting of all aliens seeking to come, live, or work in the United States,\u201d DHS said in a statement.<\/p>\n
Advocates welcome the ruling<\/p>\n
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, said that previous legal action had already paused the asylum ban, and the ruling won\u2019t change much on the ground.<\/p>\n
The ruling, however, represents another legal defeat for a centerpiece policy of the president.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis confirms that President Trump cannot on his own bar people from seeking asylum, that it is Congress that has mandated that asylum seekers have a right to apply for asylum and the President cannot simply invoke his authority to sustain,\u201d said Reichlin-Melnick.<\/p>\n
Advocates say the right to request asylum is enshrined in the country\u2019s immigration law and say denying migrants that right puts people fleeing war or persecution in grave danger.<\/p>\n
Lee Gelernt, attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union, who argued the case, said in a statement that the appellate ruling is \u201cessential for those fleeing danger who have been denied even a hearing to present asylum claims under the Trump administration\u2019s unlawful and inhumane executive order.\u201d<\/p>\n
Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center, one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, welcomed the court decision as a victory for their clients.<\/p>\n
\u201cToday\u2019s DC Circuit ruling affirms that capricious actions by the President cannot supplant the rule of law in the United States,\u201d said Nicolas Palazzo, director of advocacy and legal Services at Las Americas.<\/p>\n
Judge Justin Walker, a Trump nominee, wrote a partial dissent. He said the law gives immigrants protections against removal to countries where they would be persecuted, but the administration can issue broad denials of asylum applications.<\/p>\n
Walker, however, agreed with the majority that the president cannot deport migrants to countries where they will be persecuted or strip them of mandatory procedures that protect against their removal.<\/p>\n
Judge Cornelia Pillard, who was nominated by Democratic President Barack Obama, also heard the case.<\/p>\n
In the executive order, Trump argued that the Immigration and Nationality Act gives presidents the authority to suspend entry of any group that they find \u201cdetrimental to the interests of the United States.\u201d<\/p>\n
The executive order also suspended the ability of migrants to ask for asylum.<\/p>\n
Trump\u2019s order was another blow to asylum access in the U.S., which was severely curtailed under the Biden administration, although under Biden some pathways for protections for a limited number of asylum seekers at the southern border continued.<\/p>\n
Migrant advocate in Mexico expresses cautious hope<\/p>\n
For Josue Martinez, a psychologist who works at a small migrant shelter in southern Mexico, the ruling marked a potential \u201clight at the end of the tunnel\u201d for many migrants who once hoped to seek asylum in the U.S. but ended up stuck in vulnerable conditions in Mexico.<\/p>\n
\u201cI hope there\u2019s something more concrete, because we\u2019ve heard this kind of news before: A district judge files an appeal, there\u2019s a temporary hold, but it\u2019s only temporary and then it\u2019s over,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
Meanwhile, migrants from Haiti, Cuba, Venezuela and other countries have struggled to make ends meet as they try to seek refuge in Mexico\u2019s asylum system that\u2019s all but collapsed under the weight of new strains and slashed international funds.<\/p>\n
This week hundreds of migrants, mostly stranded migrants from Haiti, left the southern Mexican city of Tapachula on foot to seek better living conditions elsewhere in Mexico.<\/p>\n
\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/p>\n
AP reporters Gary Fields in Washington, Gisela Salomon in Miami and Megan Janetsky in Mexico City contributed to this report.<\/p>\n
___<\/p>\n
This story has been corrected to show that Leavitt was speaking to Fox News, not to a press gaggle.<\/p>\n
#Trumps #judge #sided #asylum #crackdownWhite #House #blames #political #lens<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
An appeals court on Friday\u00a0blocked\u00a0President Donald Trump\u2019s executive order suspending asylum access at the southern…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[245],"tags":[9948,1874,9950,518,2582,4715,1981,811,9951,1027,9949,1983],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4769"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4769"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4769\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4769"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4769"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4769"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}