{"id":5406,"date":"2026-05-03T11:48:23","date_gmt":"2026-05-03T11:48:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/?p=5406"},"modified":"2026-05-03T11:48:23","modified_gmt":"2026-05-03T11:48:23","slug":"america-got-rich-and-got-sad-a-top-economist-says-2020-broke-something-that-hasnt-healed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/?p=5406","title":{"rendered":"America got rich and got sad. A top economist says 2020 broke something that hasn&#8217;t healed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img src=\"https:\/\/fortune.com\/img-assets\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/GettyImages-73271344-e1777493486719.jpg?w=2048\" \/><\/p>\n<p>For the past several years, Peltzman has been combing through the General Social Survey, a random-sample poll that has asked Americans the same simple question since 1972: Are you happy? What he found about the years since the pandemic stopped him cold.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere was a huge hit,\u201d he told me recently. \u201cAnd then it\u2019s only a little bit coming back. So when you\u2019re all done, there\u2019s an unprecedented decline into the whole of the 2020s.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Americans are now at their least happy point in the survey\u2019s 50-year history. Peltzman\u2019s measure \u2014 the percentage saying \u201cvery happy\u201d minus the percentage saying \u201cnot very happy\u201d \u2014 ran at roughly +20 points on average from 1972 through the last pre-pandemic survey in 2018. That baseline held through wars, recessions, assassinations, stagflation, and 9\/11. None of it broke the floor in any sustained way.<\/p>\n<p>Then 2020 hit. The crash was 22.2 percentage points \u2014 by far the largest single move in the survey\u2019s history. The number of people saying \u201cnot very happy\u201d actually exceeded those saying \u201cvery happy\u201d for the first time ever. The measure has come back somewhat since 2021 to around +6 as of 2024, resulting in a shift from +20 to single digits within just a few years, with no meaningful recovery.<\/p>\n<p>Peltzman calls this a \u201cregime change.\u201d In macroeconomics, that phrase means something beyond a shift in numbers \u2014 it\u2019s a shift in the underlying mechanism generating the numbers. \u201cIt\u2019s not just a change,\u201d he told me. \u201cThe whole mechanism that\u2019s generating the numbers is different.\u201d Unless the next wave of data shows a return to the norm, he said, \u201cyou have to proceed on the assumption that the world is different.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The consequences are not abstract. Gallup estimates that low employee engagement costs the global economy $8.9 trillion in lost productivity annually, with unhappy workers generating higher absenteeism, turnover, and lower-quality output. The physical toll is equally severe: social isolation \u2014 the companion condition to chronic unhappiness \u2014 raises health risks as much as smoking 15 cigarettes a day and is twice as harmful as obesity, with the CDC linking it directly to heart disease, stroke, dementia, and earlier death.<\/p>\n<p>The wrong chart<\/p>\n<p>There is a debate that has defined this decade, and nobody is winning it. On one side: economists and analysts armed with charts showing wages up, unemployment low, household net worth at record highs. On the other: everyone else reports feeling squeezed, anxious, and quietly furious. The two sides are both right. They\u2019re just reading different things.<\/p>\n<p>The framework that best addresses the gap is called the aspiration gap. Economists Andrew Clark and Andrew Oswald showed that what drives satisfaction isn\u2019t your paycheck \u2014 it\u2019s where you sit relative to where you could reasonably have expected to sit, given your age and education. Financial Times data journalist John Burn-Murdoch recently put the finding starkly: there is a stronger statistical link between job satisfaction and income than expected, relative to absolute terms.<\/p>\n<p>A raise doesn\u2019t make you feel richer if everyone around you got a bigger one. And a college degree doesn\u2019t make you feel successful if a college degree no longer marks you as exceptional.<\/p>\n<p>This second point is where the story turns generational. The mass expansion of higher education \u2014 well-intentioned, broadly beneficial \u2014 has produced a society in which each successive graduating class is more credentialed and less elite than the last. One in three graduates now falls in the bottom bracket of earnings relative to their reasonable expectations, even though only about 10% are in the lowest absolute earnings quartile. In the U.K., the average thirty-something university graduate today sits at the same income rank as the average high school graduate did in 1995. The ladder shifted down, and barely anyone noticed \u2014 because the absolute numbers kept going up.<\/p>\n<p>This is the scenario that retired UConn professor Peter Turchin calls \u201celite overpopulation\u201d: a society so prosperous it makes education widely available, paradoxically producing a class of underemployed elites, with resentment \u2014 and sometimes revolution \u2014 ensuing. \u201cThe benefits that you get with wealth are now being diluted because there are just too many wealth holders,\u201d Turchin told me last July. \u201cThere is overproduction of university degrees and the value of a university degree actually declines.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Picture the 28-year-old with a master\u2019s degree and $80,000 in student loans, sharing a two-bedroom apartment in a second-tier city because the down payment on the starter home her parents bought at 26 would now require a decade of saving. She is not poor by any historical measure. She is, by the aspiration gap\u2019s definition, exactly the kind of person the data predicts will be most dissatisfied \u2014 educated enough to know what she was promised, positioned just close enough to the dream to feel its absence every day.<\/p>\n<p>Wealth, meanwhile, has quietly redefined itself upward. According to Charles Schwab\u2019s most recent Modern Wealth Survey, Americans now believe a net worth of $2.3 million is required to be considered wealthy \u2014 up 21% since 2021, far outpacing inflation. And the route that once led there has been foreclosed: median home prices have risen more than 400% since 1990, while median household income has risen less than 200%. The greatest returns now go to those who bought the assets decades ago.<\/p>\n<p>Who was hit hardest?<\/p>\n<p>When Peltzman looked at which Americans were hit hardest by the crash, he expected the usual suspects: the poor, the left behind, the least educated. That\u2019s not what he found.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe biggest decline over this period is among the most educated,\u201d he told me. \u201cThe ones with the largest concentration of people who have reached the dream \u2014 biggest decline. Smallest decline, the least educated.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Income told the same story. The wealthy fell furthest. The very poorest had the narrowest decline. The crash hit hardest precisely where expectations were highest \u2014 exactly what the aspiration gap would predict.<\/p>\n<p>And then there is the fairness question, which Peltzman described with genuine unease. For 50 years, the GSS asked Americans whether they thought other people would treat them fairly. For 50 years, the answers were positive. Then: \u201cThey\u2019ve behaved exactly like the happiness question \u2014 fell off the end of a table in 2020 and has not come back.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Author Derek Thompson has a name for all of this: the Permademic. The argument that 2020 didn\u2019t just cause a recession or a public health crisis \u2014 it caused a cultural rupture that released forces that have not been contained. Consumer prices surged 25% between 2020 and 2025, the same increase that had taken 13 years before. Confidence in every major institution \u2014 government, media, medicine, education \u2014 collapsed simultaneously. And counterintuitively, it was the richest third of households whose sentiment fell furthest, because full employment raised the cost of the services \u2014 childcare, restaurants, home care \u2014 that the affluent had come to treat as near-entitlements.<\/p>\n<p>The aspiration gap, in other words, is not just a story about young adults falling behind their parents. It is a story about a society that raised everyone\u2019s expectations and then, all at once, made them feel permanently out of reach.<\/p>\n<p>Richard Edelman, whose eponymous firm has tracked global trust for more than two decades, didn\u2019t push back when I shared the data. \u201cA lot of people\u2019s presumptions are shattered,\u201d he said. \u201cThe presumption that I\u2019m going to do better than my parents. The presumption that all facts from the CDC are true. The presumption that my doctor was infallible. These illusions have turned out to be illusions.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>His colleague David Bersoff, head of research at the Edelman Trust Institute, traced the consequences: \u201cThat starts leading to some of the erosion of the social fabric. You get polarization, polarization leads to paralysis, paralysis leads to grievance, grievance leads to insularity.\u201d The endpoint, he said, is \u201ca very negative, mean-spirited way of interacting with the world.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Specifically, Bersoff added, as people\u2019s concerns \u201cfester unaddressed\u201d \u2014 especially the ones that directly affect things they care deeply about, such as sense of personal safety, feelings of financial well-being and perceptions of being treated fairly \u2014\u00a0polarization sets in and with it comes paralysis. \u201cThis polarization\/paralysis deepens people\u2019s sense that the system is not working in general, and certainly not working for them.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Over time, polarization metastasizes into grievance which, if left unaddressed, leads to an insular mindset, defined as an unwillingness or hesitancy to trust people who are different than we are. Once we lose the willingness to trust and thus constructively engage with others across our belief, values, and background differences; progress, and the potential for progress, comes to a halt.<\/p>\n<p>As this sequence plays out, the social fabric further shreds and unravels; trust circles shrink and become ever more homogeneous; and hostility, mean spiritedness, and a general hardening take hold in society.<\/p>\n<p>And this is what we are seeing in many countries today.<\/p>\n<p>Harvard economist Raj Chetty\u2019s research quantifies the damage to the dream\u2019s foundation: more than 90% of children born in the 1940s grew up to earn more than their parents in absolute terms. For children born in 1980 \u2014 today\u2019s 40-somethings \u2014 that figure has collapsed to roughly 50%. This aligns with the 2026 Trust Barometer finding that only 21% of U.S. respondents believe the next generation will be better off \u2014 down 9 points year-over-year.<\/p>\n<p>A segregated happiness society<\/p>\n<p>Peltzman\u2019s most arresting finding \u2014 the one he described with the closest thing to alarm I heard in our conversation \u2014 is about marriage.<\/p>\n<p>His research established what he calls the \u201cmarital premium\u201d: married people score roughly 31 points higher on his happiness scale than unmarried people, a gap that held remarkably stable for 50 years across gender, race, age, income, and education. The crash changed the geometry. The marital premium stayed roughly the same, perhaps even widening. But the floor for the unmarried collapsed.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe have a segregated happiness society,\u201d Peltzman told me. \u201cHere are the married people \u2014 they\u2019re still reasonably okay, less than they used to be. Here are the unmarried, who used to be marginal. They\u2019re way unhappy now.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The numbers: 45% of American adults 25 and older are unmarried. Before the crash, they averaged near break-even on his scale. Now they average -15. The married have fallen from +30 to +50 \u2014 but still comfortably positive. \u201cI can\u2019t see that persisting without consequences,\u201d Peltzman said. \u201cPolitical, social, you name it. It\u2019s a sense of foreboding.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Marriage, in this reading, functions as the one social institution that still reliably closes the aspiration gap \u2014 a stable anchor for identity and status at a moment when career and credentials no longer deliver those things dependably. And it is, of course, in long-term decline. The institution that best buffers against the aspiration gap is the one Americans have been least likely to form \u2014 for reasons that are themselves rooted in economic anxiety: housing costs, childcare costs, the sense that you shouldn\u2019t start a family until you\u2019ve arrived somewhere. Somewhere that keeps receding.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, the experience economy has emerged as a coping mechanism. Delta CEO Ed Bastian has watched it play out in how Americans spend, talking to me about it in Las Vegas at the For All Summit, put on by Great Place to Work. \u201cPeople aren\u2019t as interested in investing in or buying things for themselves,\u201d he told me. \u201cThey\u2019re more interested in investing in themselves.\u201d Delta\u2019s premium revenue has surpassed main cabin revenue for the first time \u2014 not because Americans are uniformly flush, but because experiences have become, for a meaningful slice of the country, a substitute for the status markers that used to come from career and credentials.<\/p>\n<p>What needs to change<\/p>\n<p>Peltzman doesn\u2019t offer a fix. \u201cWe\u2019ve got to start thinking about how to fix it,\u201d he told me. \u201cThat\u2019s my only purpose. I\u2019m too old to start another career.\u201d But he offers the clearest statement of what needs to happen first: acknowledgment that something real has broken, and that the charts showing the line going up are not lying, but they are not telling the whole truth either.<\/p>\n<p>The people who run the institutions Americans inhabit day-to-day have their own answers. Edelman\u2019s is relational: listen, go local, build trust one conversation at a time. Bastian\u2019s is financial dignity \u2014 his $100 million bet that giving a Delta employee a $1,000 emergency fund changes not just their financial security but their sense of self. Hoplamazian\u2019s is emotional connectivity: \u201cWe don\u2019t live in a transactional world.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>These are, at root, the same answer. The aspiration gap doesn\u2019t close from the top down. It closes, if it closes at all, from the inside out \u2014 through institutions, relationships, and communities that make people feel like their position in the world is real, respected, and connected to something beyond a chart.<\/p>\n<p>Gallup finds that Americans are now nearly evenly split on whether the American Dream is fundamentally about opportunity \u2014 the ability to improve your life through education and better work \u2014 or stability, merely being able to hold a family together with a job and a safe place to live. Lower-income Americans now predominantly define the dream as stability. Only the already-affluent still define it as an opportunity. That is the aspiration gap made visible in survey form: the goalposts have moved not because people became lazier or less ambitious, but because a generation has quietly recalibrated downward.<\/p>\n<p>The GSS is in the field right now and Peltzman is watching for the next set of numbers. \u201cUnless the next set of numbers comes in with a return to the norm,\u201d he told me, \u201cthe world is different.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>#America #rich #sad #top #economist #broke #hasnt #healed<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For the past several years, Peltzman has been combing through the General Social Survey, a&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[245],"tags":[425,3622,1278,10822,4709,10824,1693,39,10823,187],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5406"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5406"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5406\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5406"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5406"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5406"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}