<\/p>\n
The City of Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality, whose electricity tariffs for 2024\/25 were declared unlawful by the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria, submitted a new application that contained a massive error of more than R7 billion after it completely miscalculated and overestimated the amount it would pay Eskom for bulk purchases.<\/p>\n
This would have driven electricity tariffs up sharply.<\/p>\n
Read: Eskom switch-off: These are the municipalities at risk<\/p>\n
In addition, it wants to unlawfully load electricity tariffs by at least another R1 billion in costs for debt as well as penalties and interest, according to one stakeholder at a recent public hearing held by energy regulator Nersa.<\/p>\n
Ekurhuleni is one of four municipalities whose electricity tariffs for 2024\/25 were declared unlawful and set aside by the court.<\/p>\n
The others are Madibeng, based in Brits in North West Province; Msunduzi, based in Pietermaritzburg in KwaZulu-Natal; and Johannesburg.<\/p>\n
Read:
Nersa to redo electricity tariffs for Joburg, three other municipalities
Redo of old electricity tariffs kicks off in three municipalities<\/p>\n
The court remitted the matter to Nersa so that the tariffs could be redetermined.<\/p>\n
This must be done before 30 June and could lead to adjustments on all consumers\u2019 bills in those municipalities.<\/p>\n
If this is not finalised by that date, the parties that brought the court applications will, for that period, only be liable for payments based on Eskom\u2019s Megaflex tariff, which is significantly lower than the tariffs that were set aside by the court.<\/p>\n
\u2018Riddled with errors\u2019<\/p>\n
ADVERTISEMENT<\/p>\n
CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n
Stakeholders who participated in the public hearing on the new applications by Ekurhuleni, Madibeng and Msunduzi agreed that the applications were so incomplete and riddled with errors that Nersa would not be able to lawfully determine a tariff.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf Nersa nevertheless proceeds, we will have to weigh up our options, which may include going back to court,\u201d says Melanie Veness, CEO of the Pietermaritzburg & Midlands Chamber of Business.<\/p>\n
The public hearing on Johannesburg\u2019s reapplication is scheduled for later this month.<\/p>\n
The issue arises against the backdrop of several court cases that resulted in the way Nersa has for years determined municipal electricity tariffs being declared unlawful.<\/p>\n
Read\/listen:
Nersa\u2019s mistakes turn 5.36% tariff increase into 8.76%
Nersa costs South Africans even more in tariffs<\/p>\n
Nersa must now follow the law, which requires that municipal tariffs, like those of Eskom, be based on the actual, efficient cost of supplying electricity.<\/p>\n
Consumers cannot be expected to pay for costs arising from poor planning, waste, corruption and theft.<\/p>\n
In addition to costs, municipalities are also legally entitled to a reasonable return on assets or margin. This is often regarded as a percentage equivalent to debt financing costs<\/p>\n
The regulator also has discretion to reduce the return if it believes the full return is unaffordable for consumers.<\/p>\n
Figures must be accurate, made public\u00a0<\/p>\n
Nersa is now also compelled to make municipalities\u2019 tariff applications and cost studies public so that stakeholders can meaningfully comment during the mandatory public participation processes.<\/p>\n
Nersa did this for the first time this year in respect of municipal electricity tariffs that must come into effect on 1 July.\u00a0However, there are concerns about the quality of the cost studies and the accuracy of the information on which they are based.<\/p>\n
ADVERTISEMENT:<\/p>\n
CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n
Read:<\/p>\n
Eskom threatens Ekurhuleni power cuts over R3.4bn arrears
\nHow Tshwane, Ekurhuleni want to claw back billions in \u2018lost\u2019 electricity
\nEkurhuleni body corporates pay the price for electricity tariff mess
\nHow Ekurhuleni under-charged Tembisa for electricity<\/p>\n
In redetermining Ekurhuleni\u2019s tariffs for 2024\/25, Nersa had made the documents available to stakeholders in February.<\/p>\n
A representative of MPact, a listed packaging company with a facility in Springs, said during the public hearing that he had pointed out the major error in his written submission to Nersa on 9 March.<\/p>\n
Ekurhuleni amended its application accordingly on 18 April.<\/p>\n
However, Nersa never informed those who had already submitted their representations, and they therefore did not have the opportunity to study the revised application.<\/p>\n
This correction reduced the estimated Eskom bill from R32.68 billion to R25.5 billion and lowered the gap to be filled by a tariff increase from 53.9% to 19.1%.<\/p>\n
MPact pointed out several other shortcomings in the application, including a R2.1 billion contribution by the metro\u2019s electricity division to \u201cshared\u201d costs, without any explanation of how this relates to licensed electricity distribution, as well as the absence of a regulated asset register on which the return should be calculated.<\/p>\n
Steve Jardine, managing director of RSA Clusters, which represents several manufacturers and was involved in the initial litigation, confirmed many of the shortcomings and pointed to the lack of audited financial statements for Ekurhuleni\u2019s electricity service, separate from those of the municipality.<\/p>\n
Ekurhuleni not alone<\/p>\n
Veness told the Nersa panel that the Msunduzi application is also riddled with major errors. The required revenue was markedly overestimated, because of the significant understatement of base amounts.<\/p>\n
One material error on its own reduces the required increase calculated by the municipality to balance the books from 30% to 13.6%.<\/p>\n
Correcting others would further significantly reduce the required tariff increase.<\/p>\n
ADVERTISEMENT:<\/p>\n
CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n
Moreover, Msunduzi\u2019s own figures show an over-recovery of 151% from conventional commercial consumers, with no attempt to restructure tariffs to correct this.<\/p>\n
According to David Mertens of manufacturer Autocast, which has a plant in Brits, 61% of the electricity purchased by the Madibeng municipality is lost. This drives costs up significantly.<\/p>\n
If the percentage is reduced to the allowable level of 12%, and the incorrect tariff used to calculate Eskom purchases is corrected, the municipality\u2019s expected Eskom bill drops by R107 million.<\/p>\n
Madibeng\u2019s over-recovery from industry and manufacturers amounts to 85%, and its tariff application does not reflect the outcome of the cost study, he adds.<\/p>\n
In general, says Mertens, the application is so poor that \u201cit cannot form the basis of a lawful tariff\u201d.<\/p>\n
In related news \u2026<\/p>\n
Eskom announced on Tuesday (5 May) that nine non-paying municipalities have adopted council resolutions to sign Distribution Agency Agreements (DAAs) with Eskom, which will see the power utility basically take over their electricity distribution functions as an agent.<\/p>\n
They are Nketoana, Mpofana, Masilonyana, Nala, Ngwathe, Renosternberg, Thembelihle, Govan Mbeki and Kgetlengrivier local municipality.<\/p>\n
Read:
Eskom sent to redraft \u2018one-sided\u2019 municipal distribution agreements
Eskom defiantly sticks to current municipal DAA
Municipal water, electricity losses total R25bn a year<\/p>\n
Eskom has agreed on a pre-payment agreement with the Inxuba Yethemba Local Municipality, while the Dr Beyers Naud\u00e9, Kai Garib and Mamusa local municipalities will face power interruptions for failing to make \u201crepresentations that provide a solution to continue supplying them with electricity\u201d after Eskom put them on notice.<\/p>\n
#Ekurhuleni #electricity #tariff #application #inflated #billions<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The City of Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality, whose electricity tariffs for 2024\/25 were declared unlawful by…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[1231,5135,11267,1050,9714,554],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5735"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5735"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5735\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5735"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5735"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5735"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}