<\/p>\n
The South African Property Owners\u2019 Association (Sapoa) has raised concerns over the Mangaung metro\u2019s plans to change the structure of its waste removal tariffs for non-residential customers and link it to the value of their property.<\/p>\n
This follows Sapoa, which represents commercial property owners countrywide, having successfully challenged the City of Cape Town\u2019s city-wide cleaning levy and fixed charges for water and sanitation for 2026\/27, which were structured in a similar fashion.<\/p>\n
The Western Cape High Court recently declared this unlawful and set the tariffs side.<\/p>\n
The City of Cape Town has until Friday to indicate whether it will try to appeal the ruling or adjust its budget, which must be implemented on 1 July. The municipality has so far played its cards close to its chest, saying it is weighing its options.<\/p>\n
Read:<\/p>\n
eThekwini wants biggest jump in tariffs, with Joburg not far behind
\nOutstanding court ruling leaves Cape Town electricity users in limbo
\nCourt rules Cape Town value-based tariffs and cleaning levy unlawful<\/p>\n
Mangaung states in its waste management tariff document, published as part of the draft budget, that business and commercial properties, industrial and mining properties, as well as those owned by organs of state and used for public service purposes, \u201cshall be charged based on market value as opposed to a single levy for all market values\u201d.<\/p>\n
According to the metro, the \u201ccurrent tariff was not cost-reflective and therefore the costs associated with the delivery of the service was not fully recovered.<\/p>\n
\u201c[The] tariff structure has been changed to accommodate different market values.\u201d<\/p>\n
This means that owners who currently pay R407.20 per month for having their solid waste removed once a week could now pay much more, as illustrated in the table below:<\/p>\n
ADVERTISEMENT<\/p>\n
CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n
Source: Mangaung metro<\/p>\n
Ongoing service delivery issues<\/p>\n
Sapoa CEO Neil Gopal said in a notice to members that the organisation has taken part in the legislated public participation process initiated by Mangaung as part of its budgeting process for the new financial year.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe submitted our written comments to the municipality on Tuesday 28 April 2026.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe remain particularly concerned about the municipality\u2019s intention to change the basis upon which the refuse removal tariff for non-residential properties is calculated, from the current fixed rate to a tariff linked to property values.<\/p>\n
Read:
Rising rates rage: Cape Town homeowners push back
Cape Town punts growing middle class to sustain services
Sapoa rubbishes Cape Town \u2018miracle\u2019 justification for cleaning levy<\/p>\n
\u201cWe have pointed out to the municipality that tariffs linked to property values have recently been declared unconstitutional and unlawful by the Western Cape High Court in a landmark ruling in the matter brought by Sapoa against the City of Cape Town.<\/p>\n
\u201cDespite twice following up with the municipality, no response has been forthcoming from either the officials tasked with considering budget comments, or the municipal manager, who was specifically copied in the correspondence.\u201d<\/p>\n
Gopal points out that it is \u201ca well-known fact that there is, at this stage, virtually no operating refuse removal service within Mangaung, and more and more property owners are obliged to make alternative provisions for refuse removal.<\/p>\n
ADVERTISEMENT:<\/p>\n
CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n
\u201cFor the municipality to now introduce an unlawful tariff for a service which is not being effectively rendered simply adds insult to injury for property owners.\u201d<\/p>\n
This is echoed by Christo Groenewald, AfriForum\u2019s district coordinator for Bloemfontein.<\/p>\n
He says uncollected refuse bags are a familiar scene in Bloemfontein and surrounds. Sometimes it\u2019s because the waste removal trucks have broken down or there is a diesel shortage.<\/p>\n
AfriForum has in fact started its own waste removal service to assist residents who fear health risks due to the municipality\u2019s failure.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe currently have about 300 customers in Bloemfontein and surrounding rural areas, including two schools, guest houses and businesses, some with multiple properties.\u201d<\/p>\n
Political and public opposition<\/p>\n
He says AfriForum is currently litigating against the metro to have its waste removal clients exempted from municipal fees, which they get no value for. The Democratic Alliance (DA) has also indicated it will oppose the proposed waste removal tariff structure.<\/p>\n
Sapoa says a precedent has been set regarding the unlawfulness of tariffs linked to property values. \u201cShould the refuse tariff linked to property values be adopted in the municipality\u2019s final budget, Sapoa will consider its legal options.<\/p>\n
ADVERTISEMENT:<\/p>\n
CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n
\u201cWe remain willing to engage with the municipality in a constructive manner and trust that the municipality will remove these unlawful tariffs from its budget prior to adoption on 1 July 2026.\u201d<\/p>\n
Read:<\/p>\n
Geordin Hill-Lewis hits back at Sapoa tariff court challenge
\n\u2018It\u2019s the middle class that is opposing Cape Town tariffs\u2019<\/p>\n
Frans Bothma, the DA spokesperson on finance in Mangaung, says the metro is planning an average increase of 14.96% in water tariffs. This is however unevenly spread.<\/p>\n
The fixed charge is set to rise by almost 33% and the tariff for those using six kilolitres or less per month by a whopping 47% per kilolitre.<\/p>\n
Property rates tariffs have been reduced by 5%, but the average increase in property values on the new valuation role is 25%. \u201cThat may result in an increase of 15% on the rates bill,\u201d he warns.<\/p>\n
Ben Espach of Rates Watch says owners of lower-value properties will benefit from Mangaung\u2019s increase in the general rebate from R100 000 to R180 000.<\/p>\n
He says according to National Treasury\u2019s guideline, rates bills should not increase by more than CPI. This is often misinterpreted, with municipalities arguing that a reduction in the rates tariff puts them within this guidance.<\/p>\n
Taking changes in property valuations into consideration, one must look at the increase in overall revenue from rates to establish whether the guideline has been followed, Espach says.<\/p>\n
#Sapoa #warns #Mangaung #Dont #link #tariffs #property<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The South African Property Owners\u2019 Association (Sapoa) has raised concerns over the Mangaung metro\u2019s plans…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[1462,9380,12404,1430,12403,551,372],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6644"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6644"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6644\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6644"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6644"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6644"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}