![](\"https:\/\/fortune.com\/img-assets\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/1647971067072.jpg?w=2048\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
I\u2019ll be honest about what we expected: give 5,000 smart, motivated people a full week with the best AI tools in the world, and watch transformation happen. What we actually discovered was more useful \u2014 and more humbling. The bottleneck wasn\u2019t the technology. It was us.<\/p>\n
People didn\u2019t know how to give themselves permission to experiment. They felt guilty stepping away from their inboxes. They defaulted to the use cases they already knew rather than exploring ones that might change how they worked. The tools were ready. The humans weren\u2019t \u2014 not because they lacked capability, but because we hadn\u2019t built the conditions for genuine exploration. That realization shaped everything we did next.<\/p>\n
And it isn\u2019t just a Canva problem. I see it in conversations with customers every day.\u00a0Every company I talk to has bought the tools, rolled out the policies, maybe even mandated usage \u2014 and six months later, not much has changed. Adoption is flat. Teams revert to old habits. Leadership starts wondering why the investment isn\u2019t translating into behavior change. The issue usually isn\u2019t the technology. It\u2019s the assumption that giving people access automatically changes how they work.<\/p>\n
A few years ago, employees came to us saying they wanted dedicated time and access to tools to really explore what AI could do for their work. Pockets of teams were already making breakthroughs on their own. So we decided to clear the calendar for 5,000+ employees and give everyone a full week dedicated to exploring AI. What we\u2019ve learned from doing this for two years has shaped how we help customers solve the same problem.<\/p>\n
The Problem Most Organizations Are Facing<\/p>\n
When I talk to customers, the frustration is consistent.\u00a0You can put a tool in front of every person on the team and see almost nothing change. Deploying isn\u2019t the same as enabling.\u00a0Whether it\u2019s a 500-person marketing team or a global enterprise, the pattern is the same. People need time to experiment and find the use case that actually clicks for their specific role. That doesn\u2019t happen in a single lunch-and-learn. It doesn\u2019t happen in the margins of an already packed workday. And as AI moves from simple question-and-answer prompts to agentic systems that can run entire workflows autonomously, the learning curve is only getting steeper.<\/p>\n
The missing ingredient is almost always the same: people need actual time to experiment without feeling like they\u2019re falling behind on their real job. Teams are under more pressure than ever to produce more, faster, at scale. Carving out space to learn feels like a luxury. Ironically, it\u2019s probably the highest-leverage investment a company can make right now.<\/p>\n
What We Tried<\/p>\n
That insight is what AI Discovery Week became for us.\u00a0Internally, it\u2019s helped accelerate adoption across the company \u2014 and now over 90% of Canva employees are weekly if not daily users of AI assistants. Externally, it\u2019s shaped how we think about enabling customers going through the exact same transition.<\/p>\n
The entire program was designed around one idea: meet people where they are. For go-to-market teams specifically, that meant three things:<\/p>\n
Deeply learning Canva AI so they could better support customers<\/p>\n
Improving how they used their broader AI tool stack internally<\/p>\n
Creating space for play-and-build sessions where teams could prototype apps, content systems, and workflows that made their work better<\/p>\n
From there, we layered in guided sessions, role-specific workshops, and leadership panels. We brought in teams from across Canva, Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google so employees could get hands-on with the tools shaping the industry in real time. We closed with a two-day hackathon where teams across the business submitted ideas.<\/p>\n
The results were striking.\u00a0One B2B growth marketer built a 7-agent workflow that pulls from Slack, sales calls, customer reviews, and online forums to automatically generate digital ad formats \u2014 saving 60 working days and freeing the creative team to focus on higher-impact formats like motion and video. My Chief of Staff built a full end-to-end app for Cannes Lions that coordinates scheduling across 20+ executive diaries, manages the Canva Cabana program, and pipes lead interactions directly into our CRM. By the end, as a company, we\u2019d logged 26,000 hours of hands-on exploration.<\/p>\n
What We Learned About AI Training That Actually Works<\/p>\n
A few things became clear quickly.<\/p>\n
First: most AI training fails because it\u2019s too centralized.\u00a0Use cases vary wildly across functions. A designer, a marketer, a salesperson, and an engineer are all going to use these tools differently. You can\u2019t hand everyone the same playbook and expect behavior change.<\/p>\n
Second: community accelerates adoption faster than formal enablement ever will.\u00a0The hackathon operates as a friendly competition, with the best ideas celebrated in team meetings and shared across the company. Some of the most interesting projects came from people who wouldn\u2019t normally work together \u2014 engineers pairing with marketers, salespeople collaborating with designers to solve a shared problem.<\/p>\n
Third: you\u2019re trying to create the moment where someone goes, \u201cWait \u2014 this actually works.\u201d\u00a0Once that happens, adoption becomes self-sustaining. People stop seeing AI as a trend and start treating it as part of their workflow.<\/p>\n
What This Means for How You Hire<\/p>\n
Alongside the training question, I\u2019m often asked: \u201cHow do we hire for this?\u201d<\/p>\n
Most companies are approaching this the wrong way. The instinct is to screen entry-level candidates on AI familiarity.\u00a0It\u2019s the wrong question at the wrong level.\u00a0Early in my career, a senior executive once asked me if I knew how to use Microsoft Word. He got a yes-or-no answer and learned nothing. Asking a recent grad whether they use AI is basically the modern version of that question. The answer tells you almost nothing.<\/p>\n
The gap that actually matters is one, two, three levels up \u2014 the leaders shaping how their teams work.\u00a0I recently spent close to 30% of a senior marketing leadership interview probing on this. A flat answer sounds like \u201cI\u2019d use ChatGPT to rewrite the brief.\u201d What I was actually looking for was someone who could clearly articulate how they\u2019d redesign workflows, rethink team output, and deploy emerging agentic tools in a practical way. That\u2019s what modern leadership looks like now.<\/p>\n
When you hire for AI fluency at the leadership level, you signal that it matters. When you train for it company-wide, you prove it.<\/p>\n
Sustaining Momentum Is the Harder Work<\/p>\n
A learning week is a catalyst, but what comes after is the real test.<\/p>\n
We built ongoing infrastructure to sustain it: an AI Hub with self-paced courses, toolkits, and templates; fortnightly AI Forums to surface practical use cases from across the business; a network of AI Exemplars who lead regular roadshows on emerging tools and breakthroughs from inside the company. We also run an AI Show & Tell where product and research teams showcase the latest developments \u2014 keeping the whole company current.<\/p>\n
For other leaders, the takeaway isn\u2019t that you need to replicate this exact model. The specific format \u2014 the week, the hackathon, the hub \u2014 isn\u2019t the point. The point is making AI adoption part of your culture, not just part of mandatory training.<\/p>\n
The conversation around AI is still overly focused on tools. Most organizations don\u2019t have a technology gap anymore \u2014 they have a behavior gap.\u00a0The challenge now is helping teams build enough confidence and fluency to actually change how they work.\u00a0That takes more than access and more than a week. It takes an honest reckoning with the human habits, anxieties, and organizational pressures that make real behavior change so difficult. The AI was never the hard part. We are.<\/p>\n
The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.<\/p>\n
#gave #employees #week #learn #learned #biggest #blockers #human<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
I\u2019ll be honest about what we expected: give 5,000 smart, motivated people a full week…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[245],"tags":[54,13287,1190,1917,1695,96,7852,5982,13],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7386"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7386"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7386\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7386"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7386"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stock999.top\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7386"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}