World Economic

Global trade, energy transition, financial regulation, multinational corporations, and macroeconomic trends.

Smart money is buying where governance is broken but buildings aren’t

5 min read

A study has revealed that Johannesburg’s commercial property market has a pricing problem – it is being priced by postal code rather than by asset, and this mistake is now visible in numbers.

Gmaven, a company behind one of Africa’s largest commercial property databases, compared more than 25 700 properties and over 1 500 high-value transactions made across Cape Town and Johannesburg since 2020.

Read: Governance gap leaves Johannesburg R200.9bn behind Cape Town

It found that the two cities have roughly equal commercial property markets by total value, at about R370 billion each.

But comparable office space in Cape Town trades at around double the price of the same quality space in Johannesburg – a gap worth at least R200 billion.

Behind every number in the new Gmaven study are business decisions that commercial property brokers witness regularly, be it a tenant who moved to Rosebank rather than renewing in the inner city, or a company that relocated a regional office to Cape Town because its staff could get to work without prolonged periods of water or electricity outages disrupting their home lives.

Those decisions, multiplied across the city over several years, are what Gmaven has stated as causing a R200 billion gap in commercial property values between our country’s two biggest commercial hubs.

While many will choose to read this as confirmation that Johannesburg is in irreversible decline, I believe there are more factors at play.

One discount applied indiscriminately

What the data reveals is that the market is pricing municipal risk at the level of the city, not the level of the asset.

ADVERTISEMENT

CONTINUE READING BELOW

Take Johannesburg. A well-let, well-managed building in Sandton, Waterfall or Rosebank does not carry the same exposure to failing service delivery, deteriorating infrastructure or municipal billing chaos as a building in a struggling inner-city node – yet both are being discounted as if they did.

That is a market working lazily by applying a single governance-risk premium across an entire municipality because doing the precinct-level and building-level work is harder than reading a headline.

Sound tenants, balance sheets and solid management are being priced as though they carry the same risk as a distressed asset three kilometres away with an unrelated set of problems.

Read:
SAPS won’t return to Telkom Towers despite millions spent
The cranes are back in Sandton
SA Reit returns drop sharply

An open bidding process can be used to close the distance between perceived risk and real risk – often where the money is made.

Where auctions earn their place in this market

Private treaty sales tend to anchor to whatever the prevailing city-wide sentiment is, because negotiation between two parties has a lesser ability to test what the wider market may believe an asset is worth.

A competitive auction process puts a well-diligenced asset in front of multiple buyers who have done the precinct-level and building-level homework, and lets them bid against each other.

The results of in-depth research often turn the city-wide discount on its head.

In Cosmo City, a Shoprite-anchored retail centre in the very heart of the township sold before auction at almost full mandate price, and a fuel station in the same node achieved more than double its reserve on the auction floor.

The Mayfair Convent is another example – an asset in a precinct associated with crime, hijacked buildings and urban decay, it attracted a large number of interested bidders and was snapped up before auction at well over its reserve.

ADVERTISEMENT:

CONTINUE READING BELOW

These are buyers who know that despite lower desirability from an optics point of view, these properties still provide excellent return on investment.

Contrast that with a piece of land on the corner of Oxford and Bompas Road, in one of the city’s blue-chip nodes.

A pre-auction offer was received and rejected. On auction day the property fetched about 10% below the seller’s expectation but was spot on with our own valuation intel.

The juxtaposition is instructive – stock in areas carrying the heaviest reputational discount can be easier to sell than stock in some of the blue-chip nodes, because the buyers competing for it have priced the asset in front of them rather than the postal code around it.

Read:
Joburg’s vehicle licence paper shortage exposes deeper government failure
Government seeks private capital to tackle water crisis
Joburg CBD shopping hub shut after city demolishes illegal structures

That is why, in a split market like this one, an auction of a quality Johannesburg asset is the fastest and most accurate route to a true price that has been agreed upon by buyers who have looked past the city-wide number to the fundamentals of the specific building, tenant base and precinct in front of them.

For sellers who believe their asset has been swept up in a discount it does not deserve, that is the mechanism that proves it one way or the other.

For buyers, it is a chance to secure quality ahead of any broader rerating.

The turnaround is not hypothetical

But we also need to look at where Johannesburg’s governance position stands, because the picture is more dynamic than data points suggest.

ADVERTISEMENT:

CONTINUE READING BELOW

The city has been working through a National Treasury-backed turnaround process this year, including agreed interventions to stabilise its finances and unlock withheld equitable share funding.

Government’s Johannesburg working group has pointed to early gains, among them an improved revenue collection rate and stronger partnerships with city improvement districts and property owners in the inner city.

I predicted earlier this year that improvements within the city would have a contagion effect of improving the surrounding areas.

One may argue that this does not quite erase the scale of the challenge, but by treating every Johannesburg asset as carrying the same static, worst-case risk is already out of date in some precincts, and getting more out of date as the turnaround work continues.

The role of price discovery

Johannesburg’s city-wide discount is real, but it is not evenly deserved.

The competitive auction process is the clearest way for both sellers and buyers to find out where the true value sits, especially when the wider market is pricing by headline sentiment rather than fundamentals.

Read:
Cape Town tests Joburg’s long-standing hold on SA economy
Major mall landlord ditching Gauteng for Cape Town

Norman Raad is CEO of Broll Auctions and Sales.

#Smart #money #buying #governance #broken #buildings #arent

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.